IA or not IA
I think there are two main reasons for most companies to adopt IA :
- It is already or they think it will be profitable (it will allow to gather a lot of personal informations, it will allow to gather more funding etc...)
- Everyone else is adopting IA so there is the fear to be left behind
Both are, in my opinion, bad reasons.
Maybe it could be useful to try to adopt a "we don't want to use IA" stance and wait a few years to see a new trendy technology appear which will drain all funds from IA and make it look obsolete.
For me, this [article] 1 by Andrew Kelley the creator of the Zig programming language hits the nail on the head :
LLMs are a way to make software take orders of magnitude more computational power, electricity, and human labor, while delivering a product whose extremely volatile quality is impossible to assure. The work will never be completed; it will only create the need for ever more labor.
For investors, all this churn is attractive. It's disruptive.
It's why we can't have nice software.
- ← Précédent
Fun with radio and SDR - Suivant →
searching personal sites